MoldMaking Technology

JUL 2015

Advertising in MoldMaking Technology offers

Issue link: https://mmt.epubxp.com/i/530895

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 75 of 125

72 MoldMaking Technology July 2015 Cutting Tools 72 MoldMaking Technology July 2015 FOR MORE INFORMATION: Big Kaiser / 888-866-5776 amiller@bigkaiser.com / bigkaiser.com CONTRIBUTOR Alan Miller is the engineering manager for Big Kaiser. By Alan Miller Deep pockets in mold cavities can be a real bear to machine. Toolholder length-to- diameter ratios are stretched to the max, and cutting forces are high. Without the right toolholder, these condi- tions are the perfect storm for chatter, poor tool life and molds that fail quality control muster. Moldmakers hoping to avoid these problems need to con- sider a variety of factors when selecting a long- reach toolholder. Hydraulic clamp- ing. Compared to collet chucks and shrink-fit holders, hydraulic chucks have a smaller nose diameter relative to the tools they hold. This is critical, as these hold- ers allow you to reach further into the mold without interfer- ence, which is something that's becoming more important with the increase of five-axis mold machining and its longer reach requirements. Vibration damping. Hydraulic chucks also dampen vibration and provide better surface finishes than competing methods. For those concerned about potential out-of-balance issues due to a hydraulic holder's one-sided set screw design, don't be. A good-quality hydraulic chuck runs every bit as true as a shrink- fit holder, without the hassle and expense of a shrink-fit heat- ing and cooling machine. Holding power. One area where shrink-fit has the upper hand is speed. For example, a hydraulic chuck may be rated to 35,000 rpm. Above that speed, centrifugal force tends to pull Checklist for Long-Reach Toolholders VIDEO Access video at end of article. VIDEO: Toolholding for Finishing in Confned Areas short.moldmakingtechnology.com/longreach hydraulic fluid away from the holder's internal gripping gland, causing some loss of clamping force. However, when used within its recommended operating range, a hydraulic toolholder offers holding power compa- rable to shrink-fit, with superior runout and repeatability. On average, a good shrink-fit holder has about 0.0003-inch runout, while a hydraulic chuck offers 0.0001 inch or better. Gripping strength. For optimal gripping, the use of cutting tools with shanks ground to H6 tolerance or better is recom- mended. That's because gripping force drops off exponentially as shank diameters decrease. Consider a typical ½-inch-diameter end mill. With a shank measuring exactly 0.500 inch, both shrink-fit and hydraulic holders provide 100 percent of the avail- able gripping strength. But with shank diameters in the lower range, minus 0.0005 inch, a shrink-fit's gripping force drops by roughly 60 percent while hydraulic loses around 40 percent. Maintenance level. Toolholders should be cleaned regularly with products designed to keep toolholder bores clean and dry. Using a certified test bar for regular checks of a toolholder's grip- ping force is recommended, as this gripping force tends to drop off when toolholders approach end of life. Don't forget about the machine tool as well. The clamping capability of the spindle drawbar should be routinely verified against manufacturer's spec- ifications by using a properly calibrated drawbar force gage. Balance methods. Balance is critical in long-reach milling applications. For best results, always balance toolholders as a complete assembly. Many tooling providers pre-balance their holders at the factory, but this is often inadequate, especially for long-reach applications. CAT and BT-style holders should be balanced with the retention knob and cutting tool in place, and HSK holders with the internal coolant tube installed. Hydraulic toolholders are precise devices, so proper care is essential. Operators should never engage the hydraulic clamp unless there's a cutter in place and never use Weldon-shank tools because both will damage the hydraulic mechanism. Finally, holders constructed of H13 tool steel offer the longest service life. A hydraulic toolholder designed for long-reach or problematic clearance applications is recommended for applications such as this complex fve-axis machining of a 6061 T6 aluminum workpiece. Image courtesy of Big Kaiser. Pages 51 to 72

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

Archives of this issue

view archives of MoldMaking Technology - JUL 2015