MoldMaking Technology

NOV 2015

Advertising in MoldMaking Technology offers

Issue link: https://mmt.epubxp.com/i/587376

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 44 of 59

moldmakingtechnology.com 43 material will reach. However, this tactic is particularly critical for LSR molds, because the need for tight fits between com- ponents in these tools presents fewer options for venting. For instance, straight-walled ejector pin holes can't double as vents in LSR tooling, because the material would flash into the gap surrounding the pin. Only a tapered shutoff will do. • Fewer moving parts. Ejector pins aren't the only common mold component missing from most LSR tools. These molds don't usually incorporate slides, lifters or other moving actions either. That's because undercuts simply aren't as much of a concern. As an example, Finnie cites a protective face mask that can literally be peeled off the core without risk of dam- age—the material will simply stretch and snap back into place. • Challenging ejection scenarios. Although the material's high elasticity can simplify mold designs, LSR presents its own challenges for part ejection. With plastic, the right mold design can ensure the material will essentially wrap itself onto a spe- cific portion of the geometry as it cools and shrinks. However, that's not the case with LSR, which expands as it cures. "We have to go to extra lengths to ensure that parts will be where we want them to be when the mold opens," Finnie says. Consider the baby bottle nipple pictured on page 40. The large flange at the bottom prevents the nipple from falling into LSR requires creativity when it comes to removing parts from the mold. This particular tool employs pop-up ejection.

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

Archives of this issue

view archives of MoldMaking Technology - NOV 2015