MoldMaking Technology

MAR 2013

Advertising in MoldMaking Technology offers

Issue link: https://mmt.epubxp.com/i/111447

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 43 of 59

Mold Components The U.S. is one of the few countries in the world still designing and building molds to inch standards when the global standard for measurement is metric. By using the inch standard our industry is out of sync with the rest of the world (except Liberia and Burma). This became clear early on in my career when I was working on an over-cap for a shaving cream container, whose product drawing was in metric with a 38mm overall diameter. My first thought was to stick with the metric, but as a junior engineer I needed to seek help from a senior designer. One look at the layout provoked a critical It���s time your shop question: ���What the %#&** considered making the is this? Son, we don���t do metric change, and see for things like this. You need to convert the part drawing yourself how it can open into inch dimensions and new doors of opportunity, then we can talk.��� improve ef���ciency, simplify That was 1990 when there were unlimited tooling inventory and increase opportunities for U.S. mold purchasing power. manufacturers. Advance 23 years and see a mature tooling market whose opportunities must be hard fought. Most U.S. mold manufacturers only look domestically and ignore the European market where much opportunity for new business awaits them. However, a key requirement for selling molds in Europe is fluency in the metric standards. Making the metric change cannot only open your shop up to other markets, but also improve its efficiency. By adopting the global standard we can simplify inventory, increase purchasing power (many metric components are less expensive) and work with simpler numbers with global fits and tolerances. 42 MoldMaking Technology March 2013 �� 40 +0.025 0 0 6 -0.02 +0.2 0 5 0. x R �� 45 3 0. 5 0. x �� 45 0 �� 40 -0.1 Establishing the Need for Metric Fast forward to 2008 and I am now working for a German company with operations in the U.S. When they entered the U.S. market the decision was made to develop and offer standard inch mold bases with its standard leader pin system. The market was there for this product in the nineties and early 2000s, but then came the slowdown of 2007. In 2008 the company decided to no longer offer inch mold base sizes. At this point, I was head of sales and needed to produce a plan to sell metric in an ���inch��� market. How was I going to accomplish this? I began to examine our U.S. market and noticed that we were selling metric mold bases. Who was purchasing these? It turns out that BMW and other European companies were requesting their mold suppliers design and build their molds to metric standards for consistency. This was a good start, but I was tasked with growing the market, so I created a spreadsheet to compare standard inch sizes with standard metric sizes (see Table 1). This helped illustrate just how close the two systems are���but close is not good enough when it comes to the precision work of moldmaking. Going metric will not require drastic changes; only an understanding of the new sizes and committing to them. Learn MorE Visit our Mold Components Zone for more information on mold bases, pins, ejectors, lifters, bushings, guides and alignment devices, and more. Go to moldmakingtechnology.com/zones for a complete list. Next, I examined what effect pushing the metric standard would have on the U.S. moldmaking marketplace. I discovered that many U.S. shops are partially working in metric. Some make parts for European customers and build molds that make parts to metric sizes, but the bores and plate sizes are the U.S. inch standard. Other shops are required by customers to use the metric standard, only to convert all the metric sizes to inch sizes for manufacturing. Image courtesy of Thermoplay S.P.A. One man builds an argument for designing and building in metric. Part 1 �� 46 5 Think Metric By David Frost

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

Archives of this issue

view archives of MoldMaking Technology - MAR 2013