MoldMaking Technology

JUL 2018

Advertising in MoldMaking Technology offers

Issue link: https://mmt.epubxp.com/i/995639

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 73 of 123

Cutting Tools 72 MoldMaking Technology —— JULY 2018 Pages 61 to 72 By Tom Raun What factors drive machinists to select solid carbide or indexable cutting tools? Machine Tool. Most milling machine tools purchased in the United States today are lighter-duty machines with CAT40 or HSK 63 spindles, which generate low horsepower and torque when they are operated at slow spindle speeds. Price is one of the main purchasing criteria for buying machines with these light-duty spindles. However, in moldmaking the trend toward finishing cores and cavities in a hardened state over producing electrodes and using EDM to complete a workpiece has driven mold shops to invest in light-duty machining centers with high-speed spindles. Programming. Advancements in CAM systems also are driving the selection of solid carbide cutting tools over index- able cutting tools. The ability to effectively maintain control of cutting tool engagement (or the width of cut) has provided the opportunity to optimize and maximize roughing applica- tions, especially those involving light-duty, high-speed milling machines. These new algorithms can control the engagement of the cutting tool throughout an entire operation, no matter how complex the workpiece geometry. Without these algorithms, catastrophic cutting tool failures would result that could dam- age the part or the machine spindle over time. This is especially true on a high-speed milling machine since high-speed spindle design does not hold up well against excessive abuse. Workpiece Geometry and Material. Workpiece geometry plays a major role in determining cutting tool type and size. However, workpiece geometry alone should not be the decid- ing factor for selecting a cutting tool diameter. For example, a given workpiece geometry may provide access for a 2.00-inch diameter cutting tool or larger. But, can a lighter-duty spindle be effective in running this cutter? A very common mistake in milling is to choose a cutting tool that is too large for a given machine to effectively operate. Machinists are forced to sacrifice the effective and efficient use of carbide by limiting the depth or width of cut when choosing a cutter diameter that is too large. It is critical to match the cutting-tool diameter to the machine tool capability while staying within the limits of what the cut- ting tool can handle in terms of speed in a given material. Using solid carbide end mills in a high-speed approach offers more freedom when matching the cutting tool to the machine and material, especially on light-duty machines. Fixture and Part Clamping. Rigidity is the most important variable in machining. When rigidity is lacking, a high-speed approach that reduces force may be the only option for pro- ductive milling. For example, rigidity is lacking when the workpiece geometry makes it difficult to clamp the part, when holding onto a slim piece of material in a vice or when milling operations distort the workpiece with thin walls or ribs. Milling Cutter Advancements. Most 1-inch diameter and smaller cutting tools used in milling, whether indexable or solid carbide, are designed with two, three and four flutes. The design of indexable tools usually limits the addition of more flutes since a significant area is required to create the insert pocket and chip gullet. And, solid carbide tools with two, three and four flutes are still the most common due to their versatil- ity. However, solid carbide and interchangeable solid carbide end mill designs are quickly evolving to optimize this high- speed milling approach. The small or light width of cut used allows the end mill's chip gullets to be smaller, which provides the opportunity to add more flutes with longer lengths of cut. The use of solid carbide cutting tools in a high-speed approach may offer more freedom to adapt to common machin- ing variables and to match or surpass what has previously been done with indexable tooling. This is especially appropriate in a light-duty environment that lacks rigidity and where working at lower speeds would constrain spindle power. CONTRIBUTOR Tom Raun is a national milling product manager for Iscar Metals. Choosing Between Solid Carbide and Indexable Cutting Tools Multi-flute end mills can optimize rough milling applications when machinists use them in a high-speed approach. Image courtesy of Iscar Metals Inc. FOR MORE INFORMATION Iscar Metals / 877-294-7227 / traun@iscarusa.com / iscarmetals.com

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

Archives of this issue

view archives of MoldMaking Technology - JUL 2018